Practice Areas
Wire & Mail Fraud Defense
Wire fraud and mail fraud are among the most frequently charged federal crimes because nearly any scheme touching email, phone, banking, or the mail can fall within them. Their breadth is also their weakness: the government must still prove a scheme and the intent behind it.
What the government must prove
To convict, the government must establish a scheme to defraud, an intent to defraud, and the use of interstate wires or the mails in furtherance of the scheme. Each element is a place where the defense can press.
- A scheme or artifice to defraud
- Specific intent to defraud
- Use of wires or the mails in furtherance
- Materiality of the alleged misrepresentations
Common defenses
Many wire and mail fraud cases founder on intent. Good-faith belief in the truth of statements, the absence of a material misrepresentation, reliance on professionals, and ordinary business disputes recast as fraud are all avenues the defense examines.
Why these charges escalate
Prosecutors often stack multiple counts - one for each wire or mailing - and pair them with conspiracy and money laundering. That multiplies exposure, which makes early, careful defense and motion practice important to keep the case in proportion.
Prior results and recognitions do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts.
Answers
Frequently asked questions
General information about wire & mail fraud. It is not legal advice. Every case turns on its own facts.
How serious is a wire fraud charge?
Can a business dispute become wire fraud?
What does intent to defraud mean?
Facing a federal investigation or serious charges?
Speak directly with George G. Mgdesyan about your situation. Consultations are confidential, and the sooner you call, the more can often be done.